Royalty Thread #16: the best of times, the worst of times

Spikefan

Rooting for that middle-aged team
Messages
4,645
eta... might just be one of those things you need to see in person to appreciate 🤷‍♀️

I like his other stuff from this link. I really think it’s the color red. It just seems evil to me. It probably isn’t so bad in person. But comments are equating it with blood. Just a color I would have avoided for a myriad of reasons.
 

taf2002

Fluff up your tutu & dance away.....
Messages
28,855
There's also Anne (long the most active royal) and Camilla seems to be doing a lot too. As for William being stretched, well he needs to get used to that :)
I can't believe I forgot Anne & Camilla. Since Camilla needed a solo vacation after supporting her husband when we first knew about his cancer she may burn out quickly. I'm reaching that burnout point myself so I understand. And Kate's situation is probably stressing her too.

I saw the red painting today. The article said the king looks like he's in hell. I think it's dreadful.
 

VALuvsMKwan

Codger level achieved
Messages
8,884
I like his other stuff from this link. I really think it’s the color red. It just seems evil to me. It probably isn’t so bad in person. But comments are equating it with blood. Just a color I would have avoided for a myriad of reasons.
Blood of decades of Empire? Blood of former wife?
 

canbelto

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,556
I THINK Charles wanted to do something different. Royal portraits usually look very staid and stately. In fact, I believe Elizabeth was the first one to commission royal portraits with a toothy smile. That used to be considered improper.

Oh well. If Charles has had a rough go of it lately so if it makes him happy ...
 

Parsley Sage

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,017
I don't know how much say Charles would have had in the portrait. It was first commissioned in 2020 and then was updated somewhat in 2022 when he became King. The portrait isn't for him, it's for the Company of Drapers and was commissioned to mark 50 years of Charles being a Freeman of the Company.
 

MacMadame

Doing all the things
Messages
58,934
I don't know how much say Charles would have had in the portrait. It was first commissioned in 2020 and then was updated somewhat in 2022 when he became King. The portrait isn't for him, it's for the Company of Drapers and was commissioned to mark 50 years of Charles being a Freeman of the Company.
Yeah, I read that in the article and I was wondering why they called it an official portrait. It's not going to hang in Buckingham Palace or wherever their official portraits are hung.
 

taf2002

Fluff up your tutu & dance away.....
Messages
28,855
Yeah, I read that in the article and I was wondering why they called it an official portrait. It's not going to hang in Buckingham Palace or wherever their official portraits are hung.
In 2022 he was either heir apparent or if it was painted after September he was actually king. You would think in either case he would some say about an unflattering portrait. Guess not.
 

Winnipeg

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,201
I think it is horrible beyond belief. It is different for sure but being different does not always end up in good taste.
 

puglover

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,735
I don't care for the pink/red at all but I do think it is a great painting of his face. I kind of like the idea of a fade out background of all the royal trapings and the focus being on the face of the man who is our king. Apparently, Queen Camilla has said it is a wonderful likeness of Charles.
 

On My Own

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,391

ballettmaus

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,684
A few pictures from Queen Mary's and King Frederik's state visit in Norway. I like Mary's dress better than the one she wore in Sweden (although, the fabric looks like it wrinkles easily). Not a fan of Mette-Marit's dress. The skirt's cut is strange, even though it might be because she's walking.



 

marbri

Hey, Kool-Aid!
Messages
16,576
Thoughts on Kate Middleton Tatler cover art?
Just saw this online and came to see if there were any comments on it. Apparently the artist claims it represents Catherine's soul. My only conclusion is she thinks the woman she has never met is soulless 🤷‍♀️

Link to pic for those who haven't seen it:

It looks like a school art project to me. I did look at her other work to see what her style is and it makes me wonder why she accepted this job. Her painting of Kate seems very two dimensional to me whereas I see more depth in her other work:

Which brings me back to my first impression, she must think Kate is soulless :D
 

canbelto

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,556
Kate's portrait is awful. It doesn't look anything like Kate. Charles' bloody tampon portrait is stylized but looks like him. It captured his essence. This one doesn't at all.
 

canbelto

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,556
the woman in the portrait looks like bridget moynahan, tom brady's baby mama.


since bridget moynahan looks a lot like her son jack, the portrait of kate is really a gender-reversed portrait of jack brady. look at tom -- he's such a good dad!
 

overedge

Mayor of Carrot City
Messages
35,953
Bridget Moynihan is also a really talented actress. She's a lot more than a celebrity's "baby mama".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top
Do Not Sell My Personal Information