She wasn't a minor in the sport at the time of the incident which is what Safe Sport and the National Integrity Framework would be dealing with.
As I read the Code, the Center has discretionary jurisdiction to investigate and resolve the kind of allegations Gracie Gold made but is not obligated to do so.The Center has discretionary jurisdiction to investigate and resolve allegations that a Participant engaged in one or more of the following:
1. Non-sexual Child Abuse;
2. Emotional and physical misconduct, including stalking, bullying behaviors, hazing, and harassment;
3. Criminal Charges or Dispositions not involving Child Abuse or Sexual Misconduct;
4. Minor Athlete Abuse Prevention Policy or other similar Proactive Policy violations;
5. Misconduct Related to Aiding and Abetting, Abuse of Process, or Retaliation, when it relates to the processes of the USOPC, an NGB, an LAO, or any other organization under the Center’s jurisdiction.
Australia falls under the National Integrity Framework which covers all sporting organisations in Australia. ISA has signed up to the framework and has policies in line with this. I can tell you this is taken very seriously.
It is worth reading the home page of the website, particularly why the framework was developed. It was actually prompted by the US gymnastics case.
Someone asked about an investigation in Australia in relation to this. I daresay there would be no investigation here but the various organisations would take on board any decision that happens in the US given the seriousness of the case.
I would say it's advice from their lawyer.
She wasn't a minor in the sport at the time of the incident which is what Safe Sport and the National Integrity Framework would be dealing with. It would then be a criminal case that would be dealt with by the police. And unfortunately so many sexual assault cases become "he said she said" and are difficult to prove.
Look how much it took to get Weinstein and Epstein convicted, regardless of how many women came forward. And you have someone running for US president who regardless of having a finding against him of rape against him is still a front runner.
#Metoo has been incredibly important in helping getting sexual assault taken seriously but there are still too many issues regarding the application and perception in society generally which is why women don't come forward. I still hear even women say "well why did she get herself into that situation" when it comes to the victim.
What, precisely, is preventing her and Brendan from “having a voice”?
How heroic a parent you are, ma'am. Surely someone with such strength of character could spare a few empathetic words for what the teen-age rape victim and her mother have gone through? Or are they among the people you don't give a shit about?
Of course. It's step one in the Accused Playbook. Coughlin did the same and so have other accused related and not related to skating.Which means they are choosing not to make certain statements because it is advantageous to them. She implies they're being silenced.
That could still be "I didn't know she wasn't old enough to consent according to SafeSportand she's of age in CA so it wasn't a violation." He didn't say "I did not have sex with that woman" to quote a famous politician.“ sanctioning me for alleged violations that I did not commit," Kerry said in a statement.
Reading her response is disturbing. I get that a mother wants to believe her son, she knows him differently and can´t imagine her own child doing something criminal, but that way she goes all in protection mode and makes it seem like the end of a world for her family and her almost 30 year old son who needs to move home because of this news (which obviously he knew about the allegations before so it can´t be the biggest shock), it feels over the top and dramatic. And she is so quick to believe her son and go to conclusion without hearing both sides and try to see the rational sides here. For instance: Would a mother ever able to know that her son was a rapist? And like you said, the rapports come from two different persons, that should give you a clue?Monica Macdonald’s statement “I really don’t give a shit what people want to say, what people want to think”
is a very poor and aggressive response that lacks any empathy to such serious allegations and also doesn’t do anything to help Brendan right now and shows no respect for a necessary process. Coming from someone who has such a high profile in Australian skating shows poor judgement in my opinion.
I understand as a Mother her desire to defend and care for her Son no matter what…but didn’t he admit to the charges against claimant 1, with the caveat that he didn’t realise she was too young to consent? Now his position is he didn't do it.
“ sanctioning me for alleged violations that I did not commit," Kerry said in a statement.
painting a picture of that they are innocent people that life has been destroyed and that they are the victims. She doesn´t need to say more because it´s obvious she is convinced that the allegations are not true.