Sarah
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,941
Parade started previews on Broadway tonight and antisemitic protesters were protesting or chanting at the audience outside the theatre… seriously I have no words.
I am so angry; I am shaking. This is disgusting on so many levels.Parade started previews on Broadway tonight and antisemitic protesters were protesting or chanting at the audience outside the theatre… seriously I have no words.
That looks like a fabulous few days of theater. I wasn't aware of the "Camelot" but now I'm just envious of you getting to see it. I watched a Youtube video of Philippa Soo and her Arthur (name escapes me but he looks really young) and it was enjoyable. But whoa...Lancelot! Jordan Donica has a fabulous operatic voice but I'm sure he'll match well with PS.Going to NYC in late April and seeing 7 shows in 5 days. but also
I'll be catching 2 plays, 3 revivals, and 2 new musicals. I'm seeing "Prima Facie," "Sweeney Todd," "Shucked," "Camelot," "Dancin'," "Kimberly Akimbo," and "Life of Pi."
"New York, New York" and "& Juliet" were on my list, but didn't work out with seats or timing. Guessing I stand a good chance of catching them on tour.
If anyone else enjoys plays, I saw "Goodnight, Oscar" in Chicago last year before it starts its B'way limited run, and it's really, really good. I was skeptical when I heard about Sean Hayes in the lead role, but he was incredible, mesmerizing, a true star turn.
I am very interested in what this revival of "Camelot" will be like. It is my favorite musical of all time (I adore the original Broadway cast recording of it with Richard Burton, Julie Andrews, & Robert Goulet). I refuse to watch the movie version of it again (nothing against Richard Harris, but Vanessa Redgrave can't sing, and I want "my" Julie in the role).@4skating I just learned that Aaron Sorkin ("The West Wing," "A Few Good Men," the recent adaptation of "To Kill a Mockingbird") has re-written the book for the new Lincoln Center revival of "Camelot."
"You can't handle the sword!!!!!"I'm very fond of Camelot. But my hopes sank when I saw that Sorkin was involved. The material requires a delicate touch; Sorkin is among the most hamfisted of writers.
I'm very fond of Camelot. But my hopes sank when I saw that Sorkin was involved. The material requires a delicate touch; Sorkin is among the most hamfisted of writers.
Mirvish just revealed the shows that will be playing in Toronto in the 2023-2024 season, and it looks like a great line up. I'll definitely be seeing 'Six', and maybe '42nd Street,' 'Aladdin', and/or 'Les Miserables'.
Though I am kind of surprised - didn't Jagged Little Pill just play in Toronto?
One is being done in a way that people reading the books won't necessarily know it is happening and the other is being done totally in the open with full credit to Sorkin for his changes.Because I'm in the mood for a hot take ... I wonder what the difference is between Roald Dahl's publishers rewriting him, and Sorkin rewriting Lerner's book for Camelot.
Well, in addition to the fact that stage plays are always directed, and that inherently means making adaptations and changes to the script for reasons that range from fitting the production to the performance space and resources (e.g., size of orchestra) available to making sure their audience gets the point, there's a long tradition of writers revising and updating the books of musicals both to make them more accessible to modern audiences and to make them more structured and enjoyable - see everything from Stephen Fry (I think it was) completely revamping the script of Me and My Girl so that it wasn't 50% reliant on stock gags from known performers, to various companies' updatings of G&S lyrics to make the satire contemporary. This seems to be pretty much in the latter tradition.Because I'm in the mood for a hot take ... I wonder what the difference is between Roald Dahl's publishers rewriting him, and Sorkin rewriting Lerner's book for Camelot.
Well, I hope that TPTB don't destroy the essence of the original Camelot the way the current revival of "Oklahoma" turned out. "Oklahoma" is one of my favorite musicals (confession - I'm a diehard Lerner & Loewe/Rodgers & Hammerstein fan), but the current national tour version of it is cringeworthy, especially the way the dream sequence was done (a dancer wearing a t-shirt saying "Dream, Baby Dream" & dancing to loud, blaring heavy metal sounding music). I'm not surprised that so many people walked out during the intermission (the dream sequence began the 2nd half of the show). My husband & I were tempted to walk out but we stayed for the rest of the show, extremely disappointed in how the revival was handled. We saw a revival of it @ least 10 years ago that was fabulous. The current one, IMHO, is an abomination. It breaks my heart to see a well loved musical like "Oklahoma" get butchered this way.Well, in addition to the fact that stage plays are always directed, and that inherently means making adaptations and changes to the script for reasons that range from fitting the production to the performance space and resources (e.g., size of orchestra) available to making sure their audience gets the point, there's a long tradition of writers revising and updating the books of musicals both to make them more accessible to modern audiences and to make them more structured and enjoyable - see everything from Stephen Fry (I think it was) completely revamping the script of Me and My Girl so that it wasn't 50% reliant on stock gags from known performers, to various companies' updatings of G&S lyrics to make the satire contemporary. This seems to be pretty much in the latter tradition.
A BroadwayWorld poster reports that she's now a scientist instead of a sorceress.So no Morgan le Fay?
These sorts of changes are "old-hat" for Broadway now, but it's pretty daring for Bartlett Sher, who is known for being really faithful to the look and spirit of the original productions but, with subtlety and through direction and emphasizing certain acting choices, manages to find new angles in the story/scenes to bring in new perspectives and different meanings or added depth (think Lady Thiang in The King and I, a role that is usually overshadowed but ended up being a highlight in his production). These changes I'm hearing for Camelot are surprising for a Sher production, but maybe he's tired of being known as the "safe and traditional with a modern sensibility" director.A BroadwayWorld poster reports that she's now a scientist instead of a sorceress.
Yeah, I was going to say that a lot of Broadway die hards have told me that even Julie Andrews doesn’t seem that fond of Camelot but did it as a favor for Lerner and Lowe. But it does have a legacy and its fans. I think it’s one of those shows where people feel freer to play around with since the book gave Lerner so many issues and people still felt he didn’t quite stick the landing on that one.Well the book of the original production of "Camelot" wasn't all that favorable in the eyes of the critics even 50+ years ago, it was lauded mostly for its score and performances.
And in other news, "Parade" had to cancel its performance tonight, where a lot of the NY press (including the Times) were supposed to be in attendance to review the show. Apparently technical gremlins caused the cancelation (which had a matinee today with so such problems). The audience had been seated and the curtain delayed 15-20 minutes before they announced the show would NOT go on. Talk about raining on someone's "Parade."
Man, if the hunger for Jagged Little Pill is that strong, I'm shocked.