Cachoo
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,019
I think that was part of the reason I liked the Grammy Awards this year; the thrift. (And I thought Haim knocked it out of the park.)I liked the one hour show compared to many long drawn out award shows.
I think that was part of the reason I liked the Grammy Awards this year; the thrift. (And I thought Haim knocked it out of the park.)I liked the one hour show compared to many long drawn out award shows.
I see no problem with McDormand being in the same category as Streep and Nicholson. I to this day think she should already be there for Almost Famous. She, not Kate Hudson is the glue of that movie (I know Kate didn’t win either but I think she sucked all the air). Yes, she doesn’t have the BOW but it really should not be about that. Who was the best in a given year and who is the “glue” of the movie.I really want Chadwick Bozeman to win the Best Actor Oscar. I don't care what BAFTA thinks. I find them biased, and not just this year.
I really don't want McDormand to win the third Oscar, or she will be in the same bracket as Streep and Nicholson who have played a lot more great roles - BOW (I know I will get slammed for this statement)
I am about to see A promising young woman, so I will have seen at least one actress and one BP nomination.
I don't care which movie wins the Best Picture, partly because I haven't seen any of them, and partly because this award has been wacky ever since they expanded the field.
I am for the BOW. Had the Is ars been fair, Streep would have 4-5 by now. It us a shame that fir 25 years she did not win an Oscar. McDormand is very good but IMO she is not in the same league. She may still win her third, without waiting for 2-3 decades.I see no problem with McDormand being in the same category as Streep and Nicholson. I to this day think she should already be there for Almost Famous. She, not Kate Hudson is the glue of that movie (I know Kate didn’t win either but I think she sucked all the air). Yes, she doesn’t have the BOW but it really should not be about that. Who was the best in a given year and who is the “glue” of the movie.
Streep did wait 28 years to win her third Oscar. She was not allowed to win her third, for whatever reason. As if she Should not win a third Oscar. She was put on ice after her second Oscar. No matter how great her performance, she was denied everytime. The nominations were just consolation prizes.IMO, McDormand has produced more interesting work than the safe baity films Streep churned out in the past two decades, mostly being filler nominations that could have went to more daring work by other actresses.
Anyway, that doesn't matter. It should be about performance, not some idea that only certain actors of a certain stature deserve three Oscars. Besides, McDormand is a triple crown winner (Tony, Emmy, and Oscar winner). She has tons of critics awards and been recognized for stellar work for three decades now. She's worthy.
Also, it's not like Meryl waited forever to win. Many careers are shorter than that. She won two Oscars within like four years of one another. She won her third 28 years after but got a slew of nominations and had a career where she gets first dibs on roles for actresses her age. McDormand was first nominated in 1989 and won her Oscar 8 years later in 1997. She won her second 21 years after her first one. It's not as if she didn't have to wait either.
I am for the BOW. Had the Is ars been fair, Streep would have 4-5 by now. It us a shame that fir 25 years she did not win an Oscar. McDormand is very good but IMO she is not in the same league. She may still win her third, without waiting for 2-3 decades.
Body of work?What does BOW mean?
I don't know that, also?I don't know what "Is ars" means either.
What does BOW mean?
I don't know what "Is ars" means either.
I know Meryl waited 28 years to win her third. I did the math for you in the post you quoted. And, again, Meryl only waited four years to win her second and two years to win her first after her first nomination while Frances McDormand waited eight years to win her first after her first nomination and 21 years to win her second. So in terms of years, they’re about equal so with regard to timing, Frances didn’t have it much easier. But it doesn’t really matter. BOW doesn’t matter. We’re not choosing the Olympic team or giving a lifetime achievement award You think the Academy looked at Renee Zellweger’s BOW when they gave her a second one? Or Jodi Foster winning her second Best Actress three years after her first before she was 30? Or Christoph Waltz when he won his second only a few years after his first and for another Tarantino film? Diane Wiest winning her second for another Woody Allen film a few years after her first? They never cared about that.Streep did wait 28 years to win her third Oscar. She was not allowed to win her third, for whatever reason. As if she Should not win a third Oscar. She was put on ice after her second Oscar. No matter how great her performance, she was denied everytime. The nominations were just consolation prizes.
McDormand really had just two really good performances and both won her the Oscars. I assume she is very good in Nomadland (I have not seen the movie), That makes it three. I thought she was just good, not great, in that movie about a small Town (can't remember the name right now). I didn't care for that movie either.
BOW is Body of WorkWhat does BOW mean?
I don't know what "Is ars" means either.
Walter Brennan won his 3 Best Supporting Actor Oscars over a 5-year period from 1936 through 1940 (in fact, I believe that 1936 was the first year for which Supporting Actor Oscars were given).I know Meryl waited 28 years to win her third. I did the math for you in the post you quoted. And, again, Meryl only waited four years to win her second and two years to win her first after her first nomination while Frances McDormand waited eight years to win her first after her first nomination and 21 years to win her second. So in terms of years, they’re about equal so with regard to timing, Frances didn’t have it much easier. But it doesn’t really matter. BOW doesn’t matter. We’re not choosing the Olympic team or giving a lifetime achievement award You think the Academy looked at Renee Zellweger’s BOW when they gave her a second one? Or Jodi Foster winning her second Best Actress three years after her first before she was 30? Or Christoph Waltz when he won his second only a few years after his first and for another Tarantino film? Diane Wiest winning her second for another Woody Allen film a few years after her first? They never cared about that.
Glenn Close has been waiting thirty-eight years since her first nomination to win her first. It doesn’t matter.
Also, I’m sorry but I have a hard time feeling sorry for Streep and I don’t believe she was “frozen” out from winning her third Oscar. She’s not entitled to any just because of who she is. Every year she lost, she lost due to the Academy simply voting for another person to win. Whether it’s based on that performance, narrative, or any combination of whatever. That’s how it works. I can’t feel sorry for her because ‘s one of the most fortunate actresses out there as she almost always gets nominated while many other actresses who also do great work don’t have her luxury of getting nominated for almost anything she does on screen.
Anyway, both Jack Nicholson and Daniel Day Lewis didn’t have to wait long at all to win their third Oscar. How come no gripes about them? Why focus on McDormand? If you feel the Academy disrespected Meryl for making her wait too long for a third Oscar (and taking someone else’s Oscar away) then McDormand winning or not has NOTHING to do with that and there have already been actors who won their third in shorter amount than McDormand. So it already happened no matter if she wins her third or not two Sundays from now.
Anyway, even if McDormand loses Best Actress, if Nomadland wins Best Picture, then she, as producer, will get a third Oscar for it. So you may be facing seeing her getting her third or even fourth Oscar in two Sundays.
Walter Brennan won his 3 Best Supporting Actor Oscars over a 5-year period from 1936 through 1940 (in fact, I believe that 1936 was the first year for which Supporting Actor Oscars were given).
Don't get me started on AMPAS and Glenn Close vs. Meryl Streep.
Won’t someone think of the poor deprived Meryl Streep?![]()
Not only was it ignored, one Academy member actually wrote a letter to the director, misspelled her name, and said he refused to watch it because it promoted abortion. He also made some insinuation about how half the country supported Trump without mentioning him by name but you knew what he was getting at. One of the grossest things that happened this season.Nice to see Never rarely... get so many nominations. ThebOscars completely ignored this movie.
Not only was it ignored, one Academy member actually wrote a letter to the director, misspelled her name, and said he refused to watch it because it promoted abortion. He also made some insinuation about how half the country supported Trump without mentioning him by name but you knew what he was getting at. One of the grossest things that happened this season.