MacMadame
Doing all the things
- Messages
- 64,926
USA Today has an article about SafeSport and it does not paint a very nice picture of what is going on there:
The main issue I see here is that once a complaint comes before SafeSport, that is it. The NGBs don't have jurisdiction anymore. Then SafeSport is not transparent about what is going on or why certain complaints are closed for administrative reasons. So that makes it hard to challenge them.
I don't think the answer is to give them even more money to hire more investigators but to restructure how this all works. I think that NGBs should be given a chance to clean up their act. NGBs can focus on prevention with guidelines and minimum standards from SafeSport. But an NGB should be able to remove an abuser using their own written standards and rules no matter what SafeSport decides. There should be an ability to take your case to SafeSport if you are unhappy with how the NGB handled things but they shouldn't be the primary investigators for all reports for all sports.
I also think they are too worried about the rights of the abusers to the point that they are willing to re-victimize the victims. So while the SafeSport people say:
“There’s a reason why the Center was given exclusive jurisdiction, and that’s because of decades of mishandling or just not handling allegations that came forward by NGBs,” she said. “So I would not feel comfortable giving NGBs that power back.”
that doesn't mean that NGBs shouldn't be doing anything to keep athletes safe. They should welcome NGBs making improvements to keep abuse out of their sport and work with them, not treating them like the enemy as it seems from this article that they do.
U.S. Center for SafeSport was created to protect athletes from abuse. But is it working?
Tasked with protecting athletes at Olympic and youth levels, U.S. Center for SafeSport criticized for delayed investigations, lack of transparency.
www.usatoday.com
The main issue I see here is that once a complaint comes before SafeSport, that is it. The NGBs don't have jurisdiction anymore. Then SafeSport is not transparent about what is going on or why certain complaints are closed for administrative reasons. So that makes it hard to challenge them.
I don't think the answer is to give them even more money to hire more investigators but to restructure how this all works. I think that NGBs should be given a chance to clean up their act. NGBs can focus on prevention with guidelines and minimum standards from SafeSport. But an NGB should be able to remove an abuser using their own written standards and rules no matter what SafeSport decides. There should be an ability to take your case to SafeSport if you are unhappy with how the NGB handled things but they shouldn't be the primary investigators for all reports for all sports.
I also think they are too worried about the rights of the abusers to the point that they are willing to re-victimize the victims. So while the SafeSport people say:
“There’s a reason why the Center was given exclusive jurisdiction, and that’s because of decades of mishandling or just not handling allegations that came forward by NGBs,” she said. “So I would not feel comfortable giving NGBs that power back.”
that doesn't mean that NGBs shouldn't be doing anything to keep athletes safe. They should welcome NGBs making improvements to keep abuse out of their sport and work with them, not treating them like the enemy as it seems from this article that they do.