skatfan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,479
Sounds like Richard Callahan. Didnt Tara Lipinskiās mom say the same thing about him?Who was the molester? Omg to that mother.
Sounds like Richard Callahan. Didnt Tara Lipinskiās mom say the same thing about him?Who was the molester? Omg to that mother.
Brennan is fully capable of knowing when to write ALLEGEDLY and ALLEGATIONS herself.Christine Brennan is ...the USA Today lawyers made her insert ALLEGEDLY and ALLEGATIONS everywhere. ...
I was thinking the same thing when I read that post...Sounds like Richard Callahan. Didnt Tara Lipinskiās mom say the same thing about him?
She stated they didn't know what to do. She asked her mom to not say anything as she felt he would act worse in retaliation. As well they knew it would adversely affect his wife & kids.Her mother knew Oppegard bit her 15 year old daughter, even saw the bite mark, and allowed her to continue to train with him? I don't understand that.
I get it. I had accepted an ideal job in 2019 and walked into into a very toxic work environment. I quit after 3 weeks. It was the first time I had ever experienced that and in some cases people simply canāt leave for financial reasons etc.I get it. I really do. Having had direct association with abusers, it's a constant struggle to evaluate the benefits and risks of maintaining the relationship. Sometimes, the path of least resistance is to bury the issue very deeply. It's not just figure skating. I'm aware of MANY kids who felt they had no choice in working with bad coaches at the high school level, and many more who suffered with bad team captains while the coach looked the other way, yet chose to stay on the team. I know of MANY people whose bosses yelled at them or demeaned them who did not quit their jobs. It's a pervasive issue not limited to any specific endeavor or geography. Thinking you know what you would do is very different than being in the situation. Sometimes, the only choice is to live through the situation and deal with it when time and distance make it safe to do so. For those reasons, I don't question the delays in reporting. That said, once something is reported and corroborated, I am frustrated with the lack of immediate action on the part of the higher ups. Due process is needed, but the immediate removal of the abuser from the environment is necessary.
There is also a sense of, well, these other people are still here, maybe it's not as bad as I thought. Or maybe I did something to make this otherwise excellent [coach/boss/director/choreographer/mentor] act this way. If I just keep my head down and be better, perhaps this will stop. Or the rewards for putting up with it will be worth it.I get it. I had accepted an ideal job in 2019 and walked into into a very toxic work environment. I quit after 3 weeks. It was the first time I had ever experienced that and in some cases people simply canāt leave for financial reasons etc.
Omg yes. The damage to a child. I refuse to victim blame. It is always a complex situation.There is also a sense of, well, these other people are still here, maybe it's not as bad as I thought. Or maybe I did something to make this otherwise excellent [coach/boss/director/choreographer/mentor] act this way. If I just keep my head down and be better, perhaps this will stop. Or the rewards for putting up with it will be worth it.
It's really easy to say what we would do in this situation, but I can totally understand why a 15 year old (with some level of autonomy and decision making), and the parent of a 15 year old, would hesitate to throw away years of investment in a sport, given the culture of the sport at the time. With the open conversations of the past few years, particularly the revelations about gymnastics, I imagine it would be different. 2013 wasn't that long ago, but in terms of shining a light on abusive behavior, it might as well be a different century.
The 2013 way of thinking you have described reflects the way many people here on FSU approach the Oppegard, Coughlin, , Callaghan, CiprĆØs, and Nassar stories even now. People here struggle or refuse to believe the evidence or else believe that the victims should have kept quiet and even acquiesced in how they were treated. On the flip side, other people here on FSU were expressing outrage at abuse well before 2013, particularly with respect to Callaghan, who, of course, had already been facing accusations for years.2013 wasn't that long ago, but in terms of shining a light on abusive behavior, it might as well be a different century.
I think you mean Cipres, right? I haven't heard of any allegations against Massot.The 2013 way of thinking you have described reflects the way many people here on FSU approach the Oppegard, Coughlin,MassotCipres, Callaghan, and Nassar stories even now. People here struggle or refuse to believe the evidence or else believe that the victims should have kept quiet and even acquiesced in how they were treated. On the flip side, other people here on FSU were expressing outrage at abuse well before 2013, particularly with respect to Callaghan, who, of course, had already been facing accusations for years.
I would say that not all that much has changed, and that there is a lot more work to do on shining the light.
@Judy SafeSport is an American body, but other countries do have similar institutions.
I agree there is a lot more that is needed, but the fact that these cases are finally seeing the light tells me that things have changed greatly, because governing bodies are having to come to terms with their years of looking the other way. It's messy, there will be missteps, it's not going to be enough, and there will be a lot of outrage about why nothing was done at the time/the consequences now, and yes, there will be those who are angry that we all can't just let things in the past stay there, but I don't think we are ever going back to the systemic culture of secrecy around abuse that there was until very recently.I would say that not all that much has changed, and that there is a lot more work to do on shining the light.
Thatās what I thought. I am not a parent but I love children. I do remember though I loved watching gymnastics at a young age but I remember watching the U.S. gymnastic that competed with the injured foot with the team and my gut instinct was that things were not right and feeling really uncomfortable. I stopped watching after that. i fully support those young women having the courage to come forward.The 2013 way of thinking you have described reflects the way many people here on FSU approach the Oppegard, Coughlin, Massot, Callaghan, and Nassar stories even now. People here struggle or refuse to believe the evidence or else believe that the victims should have kept quiet and even acquiesced in how they were treated. On the flip side, other people here on FSU were expressing outrage at abuse well before 2013, particularly with respect to Callaghan, who, of course, had already been facing accusations for years.
I would say that not all that much has changed, and that there is a lot more work to do on shining the light.
@Judy SafeSport is an American body, but other countries do have similar institutions.
This. My nephew coaches soccer and baseball. In his area, kids and parents are instructed on how to report and are being actively encouraged to report both coach issues and hazing. There's a triage process to attempt to separate the "Iām mad at the coach so I'm gonna get the coach in trouble" reports from those that warrant further inquiry. Once an inquiry is started, the coach is not allowed to interact with kids younger than 16. It's modeled after the child abuse hotline process.but I don't think we are ever going back to the systemic culture of secrecy around abuse that there was until very recently
As I said...
...veeeeeeery interesting to see whose automatic response is an attempt to discredit the only figure skating journalist speaking out against sexual abuse in our sport.
veeeeeeeery interesting.
this. If a "tabloid" journalist is the one bringing this into public scrutiny, they are still doing a huge service by shining a light on it.3. I am not a fan of Christine Brennan. I do not believe for a second that she's covering abuse in skating because she cares. It's good for clicks, therefore she is on it. Yet I do not give a rat's ass about her motives. As long as she's bringing something important to our attention, it has value.
Since when did the Oppegard allegations have anything to do with sexual assault? I personally know skaters who have been victims of sexual assault by their coaches, including those caught and banned by the USFS. You are barking up the wrong tree, Missy...As I said...
...veeeeeeery interesting to see whose automatic response is an attempt to discredit the only figure skating journalist speaking out against sexual abuse in our sport.
veeeeeeeery interesting.
Well maybe it's an East Coast vs. West Coast thing as far as what rumors you hear. Certainly none of the sexual abuse allegations against the East Coast coaches were surprising to me and I was very happy they eventually were shamed and banned. And that my sibling was never victimized by any of them as a national level competitor.Some thoughts...
1. Rumors about Oppegard persisted for years, starting with his behavior as a competitor. This is not a surprise. It's only a reflection of what coaches (especially the ones that have a former Olympian tag attached to them) have been able to get away with for decades.
3. I am not a fan of Christine Brennan. I do not believe for a second that she's covering abuse in skating because she cares. It's good for clicks, therefore she is on it. Yet I do not give a rat's ass about her motives. As long as she's bringing something important to our attention, it has value.
Of course the pre-existing relationship is going to make my reactions different as the charges to me are shocking, particularly since I have taken a nearly two-decade timeout from being a USFS official and attending major skating competitions/shows. Certainly I haven't kept up with Oppegard since then and hadn't heard any of the abuse rumors either through the grapevine or read anything on the skating boards (admittedly, I don't spend nearly as much time on them as I did in the past). My sibling's competing at the Championship level at US Nationals overlapped with Oppegard's which is when my extended family first met him, and we heard nothing at that time either about bad behavior, or when my sibling worked with him a couple years later on pairs moves after they both turned professional and started coaching.1. I just want to reiterate my past comment in re: to the difference between a report, an investigation and an adjudication. You're assuming that the most recent report was the first time that the alleged biting of Jessica was reported to an authoritative body. It's important to note that claimants aren't the only people who can make reports - witnesses and related parties can as well.
2. I read your earlier comment and can only imagine how confusing and shocking this article must be to you. I'm in a very different situation than you - I don't personally know Oppegard, however, I do know of several people who've reported him for physical and emotional abuse (a mixture of claimants and witnesses).
I believe in due process*. I also believe that people have a right to forming their own opinions. At least in the US, terms like due process are principles applicable to legal matters - not to the individual opinions of figure skating forum members (but that's a rant for another day LOL).
Generally speaking, we form our opinions based on the information that we have in front of us. I'm sure that your pre-existing relationship and opinion of Oppegard is impacting your opinion of this matter the same way that my lack of relationship w/ him and knowledge of certain allegations is impacting my own. Such is life.
Hopefully, if/when more of the information is released to the public, you will change some of your positions & recognize how some of your comments have been harmful. With that said, I wish you the best.
100%. Society, and especially elite figure skating, still protects abusers in positions of power. Those with the power to affect real change more often than not identify more with the abuser than with the victim.
@misskarne didn't say that the Oppegard relations had anything to do with sexual assault. She said that Christine Brennan speaks out against sexual abuse. And so she has -- on other occasions.As I said...
...veeeeeeery interesting to see whose automatic response is an attempt to discredit the only figure skating journalist speaking out against sexual abuse in our sport.
veeeeeeeery interesting.
Since when did the Oppegard allegations have anything to do with sexual assault? I personally know skaters who have been victims of sexual assault by their coaches, including those caught and banned by the USFS. You are barking up the wrong tree, Missy...
with emotional abuse it's frequently all there for many to see. So why was it tolerated? Well, there are a number of possible reasons.
My resentments towards Ms. Brennan are mostly leftover from the Golden Era of the late 1990's and early 2000's when she misreported and sensationalized stories that were hurtful to friends of mine, all to sell newspapers (not as many clicks back then).
All abuse is emotional abuse.In addition to the reasons you mentioned, I think emotional abuse has often not even been considered abuse (and still isn't by many).
Yes, but we have to remember that we are trained as children to excuse verbal abuse. āSticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me.ā This tells children that it is incumbent on them not to be hurt by words, which gives abusers a pass; that if they are hurt by words, itās their problem; that if they canāt brush off words, then thatās their failure, thatās their shortcoming. These children grow into adults and bring this lesson into reality, creating environments and systems that protect verbal/emotional abuse, and excuse it as the fault of the victim.All abuse is emotional abuse.