Holy Headband
chair of the Lee Sihyeong international fanclub
- Messages
- 1,654
This seems like a real problem to me. A lot of international judges are on the older side and haven't skated or coached competitively in decades, if they ever did. They tend to be stuck on whatever version of the rulebook they remember most vividly from their youth.It's almost as if people forget the big fed PCS boost, or the TES boost to PCS. We all openly discuss how Plushenko didn't deserve the 9s he would get in PCS, as if it's a well-known joke.
I have talked to judges and heard first-hand how some don't know the rules. I got into an argument with a well-known US judge about the rules for under rotation. He insisted I was wrong about what the < and << meant, and what deductions judges are supposed to make. When presented with the ISU document proving I was right, he dismissed me and wouldn't discuss it further. He also claimed that technical panels call consistently, and that if the technical panel calls a jump rotated, or a take-off edge clean, then that's what happened.
There's the actual rules and guidelines that judges are supposed to follow, and then there's what the judges actually do. They're not the same thing.
I don't think old people should be barred from judging, far from it. But I wonder what efforts the ISU makes to ensure judges with valid international certification are up to date on the current rulebook and are committed to enforcing it as opposed to using whatever tools are currently available to them to express outdated or unsubstantiated opinions. Do judges have to get re-certified every time there's a new code of points, or do they only have to go to a few seminars where the exams are less consequential? Does their performance/track record get evaluated periodically by external reviewers (i.e. judges not from their own federation)? Are national federations encouraged to get new judges certified?
Remember when the ISU used a clip of Trusova (I think) to illustrate skating that is worth a 6 in skating skills at some judging seminar, which got leaked on Twitter? And then she proceeded to get, what was it, 8 or 8.5+ in SS in every competition that season? There's quite possibly a major disconnect between how the ISU tells judges to apply the rules behind closed doors and what they actually do with them, but if so, what is the ISU doing to bring actual judging and the rulebook into alignment?
I suspect they may be giving judges free rein because it's difficult and expensive to train a judge and send them to competitions, and the ISU doesn't want national federations to stop investing in developing/supporting judges. But surely there has to be a middle ground between appeasing federations and not doing any quality control.